Sunday, May 10, 2009

06-26-2006, 05:03 PM

Quote:
There actually has been a lot of coverage about this. Take Robert Samuelson in the Washington Post. Bush's plan has gotten bad reviews in the New York Times as well. There is a "debate" on the immigration issue because the ruling class is split on it and because it is such a lemon with the bases of both major political parties.

This is true. I would add to the list of opportunistic infestations, the Bush family itself, which has dynastic pretensions. I will say that the ruling class seems quite committed to a)doubling legal immigration b)an amnesty c)AFTA and the ultimate confederation of Mexico, Canada, and the United States under the benevolent gaze of NGOs.

I have no question that they will fail, I only wish to a)take advantage of the situation to spread the word and b)minimize casualties. The last major Jewish push for globalization under Communism, under which I include a reactionary German response, did kill 100 million people and may have fatally comprimised our civilization.

I fear the next war the Jews are at the center of, which we may already be hip-deep in the Near East, may escalate to larger proportions. Which is to say, larger proportions than the Second World War.

I say this so that readers will understand my constant and vehement insistence on the permanent and total separation of Jews from every other population on Earth.

Wagner: "I consider the Jewish race the born enemy of pure humanity and all that is noble in man; there is no doubt that we Germans especially will be destroyed by them."

Voltaire: ""They are all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and The Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race."

Quote:
That might very well be case, but I haven't seen much evidence of it.

My point was both that we have evidence that one major lobby - which was heretofore a major anti-immigration player - was taken out of the game by one Jew, and also that the climate of opinion in which the other opportunistic infections thrive is created by Jewish intervention. My messy analogy again: the patient really didn't die of feline leukemia, but of a comprimised immune system, destroyed by HIV. We are discussing proximate and distal causes.

Quote:
It seems reasonable to me that business groups, like the Catholic Church, are doing this for their own reasons. That's the most parsimonious explanation. They don't care about the white race. They don't even identify with their own country anymore.

I have no doubt that businesses are doing it for their own reasons - they must now compete with other businesses which have limitless supplies of cheap labor. You almost can't not do it. Still - the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was not powerful enough to stop Operation Wetback. Why has happened between now and then to make this explosion in pro-immigration sentiment possible?

And for each answer to that question: the sixties, the Second World War, etc. - ask yourself, and what would these periods have been like with no Jewish input into American cultural or political life at all?

How far would the Civil Rights Movement have got, for example? However, I think you take my point. Proximate causes operate in a field established by distal causes. Yes, the Titanic is sinking because there is a tear in its hull beneath the waterline. With that in mind, why is there a tear in its hull beneath the waterline?

All this said, the discussion of the behavior of the Catholic Church is a complicated matter in its own right, and if we wish to go into that, it should become a separate thread. I obviously think that Catholic behavior in non-Catholic nations may require their sequestration and repatriation to Catholic nations, following a White self-recovery. Catholics are obviously politically untrustworthy, and I would say that they act like Jews, but lack the racial instincts for long-term crypsis and the almost supernatural levels of dissumulation of which even the meanest Jew seems born capable of.

One will note, however, that there are only two words in English that really express a Talmudic level of dissimulation: casusitry and Jesuitry. Both are from the Catholic tradition, both are synonyms for cunning and high-handed lies based on word-splitting and other forms of rhetoric.

Wintermute

[url]http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=118485&postcount=36[/url]